A federal jury in East Texas returned a $18 million verdict against Autodesk for infringing on two software patents owned by a Michigan technology company.
If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Polls
Loading ...Take the BIM Surveys
Buy the Book
Category Cloud
Adobe ADT or ACA AIA AUGI AutoCAD 2006 AutoCAD 2007 AutoCAD 2008 AutoCAD Architecture Autodesk Autodesk University Bentley BIM Blogging CAD Blogs CAD Management CAD Standards Customization Events Feedback Hardware Journals Leadership Licensing LISP Microstation Negotiating PDF Revit SketchUp Software Standards Support Survey The Basics Tips Training Upgrades Users Vacation Vendors Whatever
Pages
Archives
Categories
WP Cumulus Flash tag cloud by Roy Tanck requires Flash Player 9 or better.
Subscribe to the Blog
See more on Twitter
Follow me on Twitter
Recent Posts
- Journal of Building Information Modeling - Fall 2008
- A Useless CAD Standard - Part 4
- A Useless CAD Standard - Part 3
- A Useless CAD Standard - Part 2
- A Useless CAD Standard - Part 1
- Do you add Value? - Intuition
- Do you add Value? - with Enthusiasm
- Do you add Value? - Through Determination
- Revit 2009 - Computing Infrastructure Recommendations
- Do you add Value? - Providing Structure
- Do you add Value? - With Creative Thinking
- Do You Add Value? - Your Expertise
- Do you add Value? - More on the CAD Manager Position
- Do you add Value? - The CAD Manager Position
- What Value Do You Bring?
Recent Comments
- CADDManager on A Useless CAD Standard - Part 4
- X on A Useless CAD Standard - Part 4
- B on A Useless CAD Standard - Part 4
- Arvind Soni on How to respect a CAD Manager (or anyone else)
- CADDManager on A Useless CAD Standard - Part 4
Leave a Reply